Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34
  1. #1
    Joined
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    972

    Psssst!!! Hey all you Photoshop experts, in here --->

    I have a banner I want to make. I have two ideas:

    1) Take a a color picture, turn it black and white, then but a colored hue on it. Not sure if I can take a color picture and do that but it seems like it would be just as easy to convert it to B&W first.

    2) start with a rectangle. Left side will be black fading to blue and then insert above picture floowed by the blue going to black. As a twist, the lightest part of the blue will be the hue the above piture will have.

    Any ideas what tools to use?

    Thanks.
    10 bay tower
    2800+ downgraded "B" chip
    Epox 8RDA+
    no name 128MB Video
    512mb Blue chip?????????????????
    Western Digital ATA 133 40GIG (Divided in 5 partitions including quad-boot with win98/win2k/winXP/.NET (in removable bay)
    Seagte 80GIG ATA 100
    storage disk (In removable bay)
    80 pin ATA ribbon cables all the way
    LG DVD
    BusLink 52x CD-RW
    thermalright AX-7 (fits with plenty of room)
    U.S. Robotics Pro
    ESS Solo-1 PCI sound card
    Epson Perfection 1250 scanner

  2. #2
    Joined
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    26
    Posts
    20,455
    1) Easy, Image > Adjustments> Hue/Saturation. Check the Colorize box and set the proper color, saturation, and brightness.

    2) Not sure what you mean...explain it in another way? Do you want like a semi-transparent layer of blue/black gradients over the picture? If so..you could make a black to transparent and back to black again gradient and do a semitransparent overlay over the pic. I'll post an example...
    PORTABLE: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 2.4GHz | 4GB PC6400 DDR2 | 160GB 7200rpm HDD | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 | 8x DVD±RW/Blu-Ray | 15.6" UltraSharp TrueLife display

  3. #3
    Joined
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    26
    Posts
    20,455
    OK, this isn't exactly a semitransparency (except for the gradient, but not the gradient layer) but is this it?

    PORTABLE: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 2.4GHz | 4GB PC6400 DDR2 | 160GB 7200rpm HDD | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 | 8x DVD±RW/Blu-Ray | 15.6" UltraSharp TrueLife display

  4. #4
    Joined
    May 2001
    Location
    Newnan GA, USA
    Posts
    5,628
    wile there is a PS question thread I'll add one,


    is there a way to crop a photo and easily maintain a 4/3 ratio? without having to manually count pixels, like a crop box I could make and adjust for position and size but it constrains its height width ratio? or eaven better is there a way to make a 1024/768 crop box?


    I hope I explained that so someone can understand it

  5. #5
    Joined
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    972
    Yes, that would work El` perfecto!!
    10 bay tower
    2800+ downgraded "B" chip
    Epox 8RDA+
    no name 128MB Video
    512mb Blue chip?????????????????
    Western Digital ATA 133 40GIG (Divided in 5 partitions including quad-boot with win98/win2k/winXP/.NET (in removable bay)
    Seagte 80GIG ATA 100
    storage disk (In removable bay)
    80 pin ATA ribbon cables all the way
    LG DVD
    BusLink 52x CD-RW
    thermalright AX-7 (fits with plenty of room)
    U.S. Robotics Pro
    ESS Solo-1 PCI sound card
    Epson Perfection 1250 scanner

  6. #6
    Joined
    Oct 2002
    Location
    with Court & Jon
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,376
    RavenTai, I think I found an answer to locking the crop ratio. With your crop tool chosen, input numbers into the "width" and "height" boxes in the upper left corner. Whatever ratio you enter, the box will be fixed at.

    A: HP Pavilion 6103nr laptop * Intel Core Solo T1350 * 512 MB RAM * 60GB HDD *Win XP Media Edition
    B: Athlon XP 2000@1.7 *Gigabyte GA7VAXP * 1024MB PC2100 * Matrox G550 * (2) 160GB Maxtor * 40GB Maxtor * 16x DVD-ROM * 48X12X48 CDRW * *WinXP Pro
    Headphones: Grado SR 60 * Beyerdynamic DT 770 * Sansa Clip 1GB * Little Dot I+ amp on order

  7. #7
    Joined
    May 2001
    Location
    Newnan GA, USA
    Posts
    5,628

    Thumbs up

    SWEET! I should have seen those boxes, you mean the tool spacific bar up at the top where you hit check when you have what you want? that that sounds perfect, there is so much to know about photoshop a casual user like me is easily lost


    gonna have to check that out when I get home, I have a verry large tiff of a eclipse and would like to crop it to 1024/768 it is not a 3/4 ratio so if I set windows to strech it the round eclipse is quite distorted, if I set to center I get a small portion of the Image

  8. #8
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    158
    Originally posted by RavenTai
    wile there is a PS question thread I'll add one,


    is there a way to crop a photo and easily maintain a 4/3 ratio? without having to manually count pixels, like a crop box I could make and adjust for position and size but it constrains its height width ratio? or eaven better is there a way to make a 1024/768 crop box?


    I hope I explained that so someone can understand it
    Yes. There is a way. You can set a fixed aspect ratio.
    The way to do it is with the Square selection tool.
    Which version of PS are you using?
    I will send you screen shots.

  9. #9
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    158
    The answer to post number 1 -

    Get an image. *not a GIF
    Make a new layer (Shift+Ctrl+N)
    On the new layer, fill it with whatever color you want.
    Then adjust the opacity with the slider bar.

    OR....

    Create a new document (Ctrl+N)
    Put whatever colors you want in it.
    Paste your picture of choice (Ctrl+V)
    Turn it black and white (Ctrl+Shift+U)
    Then adjust opacity so the color below shows through.

    PM me if you guys need anymore help.
    Dont let anyone ever tell you that graphics are only done on a Mac.

  10. #10
    Joined
    Mar 2001
    Location
    black market
    Posts
    1,781
    is this what you had in mind?


  11. #11
    Joined
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    26
    Posts
    20,455
    Originally posted by zirik
    is this what you had in mind?

    I don't think he's got a red X in mind..
    PORTABLE: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 2.4GHz | 4GB PC6400 DDR2 | 160GB 7200rpm HDD | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 | 8x DVD±RW/Blu-Ray | 15.6" UltraSharp TrueLife display

  12. #12
    Joined
    May 2001
    Location
    Newnan GA, USA
    Posts
    5,628
    thnaks between those two tips I figured it out

    first run (little time) gonna do a little more with it later

    Thank You


    http://webpages.charter.net/raventai...se%20sized.jpg

  13. #13
    Joined
    Mar 2001
    Location
    black market
    Posts
    1,781
    doh! my bad... hehe. fixed the file now.


  14. #14
    Joined
    Mar 2001
    Location
    black market
    Posts
    1,781
    Originally posted by Eyenovation
    PM me if you guys need anymore help.
    Dont let anyone ever tell you that graphics are only done on a Mac.
    there are many reasons why graphics are done on macs which is why a majority of "designers" and "artists" use them. the biggest reason is the workflow which is facilitated by the operating system. it is designed with artists in mind. i can work faster with photoshop on a mac than win2k. the alt key on a pc just doesnt function as well as the cmd key on a mac.


  15. #15
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    158
    Actually, I suppose it's to each their own... but in reality I think if you did the research you'd see that a PC is actually more advantageous and now becoming more common in the designer's workplace.

    In may design applications, most notably web design and video editing, PCs are the unit of choice - not the overpriced Steve Job's machine. This is because: 1. Flash runs like poo on the Mac, and that the Mac does not have the raw processing power to that of a comparably equipped PC.

    Not only is a moderately built PC much faster than the top of the line Mac, it's much more inexpensive.
    Sure, Macs look better on the whole than your run of the mill PC, but that's not enough to warrant the 3000 price tag.

    The myth that Macs are better for artists is an old misnomer from the days when the GUI OS's were introduced. Macs led the way... but now things have not only been equalized; PC's have surpassed the capabilities of any Mac, IMO

    Of course, with Al Gore now on the board at Apple, who knows - maybe Macs will improve with their handling of internet content and development apps.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •