Page 6 of 25 FirstFirst ... 234567891016 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 363
  1. #76
    Joined
    May 2002
    Location
    The Lost Continent of Atlantis
    Age
    48
    Posts
    3,694

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    2634 on top rig in sig

  2. #77
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    195

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    Wow..some low scores..the ones with the 9800 pro card..I wonder if my score will also be that low. My parts are comming today so once I build first thing im going to do is check my score. I know my first rig will prolly get like a 200 but anyone want to guess what my 2nd rig score will be?

    Athlon 64 3500+ @ 2.4Ghz (11X220) 1.60v (Stock heatsink/fan) l Msi K8n Neo2 Platinum l Ati Radeon 9800 Pro l WD 120 gbl WD 200gb l 1Gb Kingston pc3200 Ram l Plextor 712-a Dvd Recorder l Lian Li PC-65B Case l Thermaltake Silent Purepower 480W psu

  3. #78
    Joined
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    oh bugger it always when there comes a new 3Dmark I get losy stats....
    oh Well 2128
    I guess I need to look into this hehe
    Last edited by ZooG; 10-07-2004 at 03:04 PM.

  4. #79
    Joined
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mclean, VA
    Posts
    348

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    I got 1285 with the system listed in my sig....this was running @ 1024x768 .....Should I be worried, I just ran 01 and got 18,200 without doing much (and i've been messing around with/ downloading tons of stuff)...
    Holy crap this sig is old, I feel like a charter member!


    A64 3200 (213 X 10)
    1 GB(512MB X 2)Muskin PC3500 CH-5
    | MSI K8T Neo FIS2R |
    Albatron FX5900 flashed to 5950Ultra (486/975)
    WD 250 GB ATA133 w/8Mb buffer
    NEC 3520A DVD Dual R/RW
    NEC 1300A DVD R/RW
    16 x panasonic DVD rom
    Raidmax Scorpio case w/ window, tricolor LED fan , 420wPS & Blue & Red HD LEDs
    Samsung 17 inch LCD 175V

    3Dmark01: 19535
    3Dmark03: 6355
    Aquamark 3: 51834

  5. #80
    Joined
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
    Age
    36
    Posts
    255

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    Now with SoftMod .. 16Pipelines x 6vs


  6. #81
    Joined
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,358

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigchingan
    I got 1285 with the system listed in my sig....this was running @ 1024x768 .....Should I be worried, I just ran 01 and got 18,200 without doing much (and i've been messing around with/ downloading tons of stuff)...
    I wouldn't be too worried... As long as Dx8/8.1 cards get support in games, you have one of the best performing cards using the code designed for those cards. I'd say it is likely your Fx5900 will do fine till 2nd half of 2005, without you losing TOO much of eye candy.

  7. #82
    Joined
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Chicoutimi, Quebec
    Posts
    107

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    576.. Any other gfx5700 user that got such a bad result ??
    Intel Q9450
    Asus Rampage Formula
    8GB ram Crucial Ballistix
    XFX 8800 GT
    Creative Labs FX Xtremegamer
    PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750 Watt
    Thermalright Extreme 120
    Cambridge Soundworks THX 6.1 Speaker
    Vista Home Premium 64 Bit


  8. #83
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    42

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    That's about right for the FX5700 apparently, I got a 222 with a FX5500, XP3200+, 1 gig 2700, BTW when are those 6600 series and X700 series gonna go AGP that's what I'm waiting for to upgrade. New Score 238 with tweaking.
    Last edited by Sohcguy; 10-14-2004 at 04:34 PM.

  9. #84
    Joined
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,035

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    215 - Time for a new gfx card and burn the damn FX5200!!!

  10. #85
    Joined
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    338

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    5780 is my score with 3d mark 05 on a x800 pro flashed to XT PE. backed up with 1 gb pc 3200 ram and 3200+ @ 2.31 ghz.
    |mag!nati0n.m@k3s.reaLity.pOss!bl3
    -------------------------------------------
    Abit QuadGT . Intel E6700 @ 3.2Ghz. Calibre 8800 GTX
    2GB GEil 800mhz DDr2 . WD 74 GB Raptor . WD 320GB x 2 . WD 500GB


    Benchmarks - Coming soon
    3DMark 06: 11353
    AquaMark3:
    PCMark 05:
    PerformanceTest: 898.2

    -------------------------

  11. #86
    Joined
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    903

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    Im sure Nvidia is working on better drivers ! Beware ATI, the war is far from over
    Intel Core i7 920 Nehalem @4Ghz
    CoolerMaster V8
    EVGA X58 3X SLI
    Antec Signature 850W
    Antec Twelve-Hundred
    6GB Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600mhz(Triple Channel)
    EVGA GTS 250 (500mb) x 2 (SLI)
    WD Caviar Black SATA 1TB
    Seagate 500G External
    Samsung SyncMaster T260 (HDMI)
    HK SoundSticks II
    Vista64 SP2

  12. #87
    Joined
    Jan 2001
    Location
    calagary Alberta ,Canada EH
    Posts
    5,176

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    2700+ on a sapphire radeon 9800 pro 460 core 306 mem [memory sucks on this card]
    Foxx

    Hot deals trading rules
    rig
    950 i7 core,evga ftw3 mobo,3x2 gigpc12000,1xevga480, 4 x 74 g raptors, 2- 500gb seagates,46inch lcd monitor max res 1920\1080,obsidian 800d

  13. #88
    Joined
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,250

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    4650 with an x800pro oc'd to 560/540

    a64 3200 stock
    1gb crucial ballistix pc3200

  14. #89
    Joined
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Age
    47
    Posts
    2,069

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    With the new 66.81's I get 5630 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=92880

    With the old 65.xx I got 4851 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=21312

    Something smells a might-bit fishy to me people. How in the hell can I use a benchmark with any level of confidence that produces such a huge difference in performance depending on what DRIVER you use?

    I also have a severe issue with DST being enabled by DEFAULT. Before anyone starts bitching, keep in mind that I have nVidia hardware too...but it is just WRONG that they enabled an nVidia ONLY feature like DST in the DEFAULT benchmark! That means that every single "FREE" ORB result is FLAWED because in the FREE version you can't even TURN OFF DST!

    One second they tout that their goal is to present their benchmark as an "even playing field" yet they not only provide DST functionality...which, in itself is no big deal, no....they ENABLE IT BY DEFAULT!

    Shame on you FutureMark!

    BTW: Running a test where I scored around 4,400 3dmarks (had HIGH QUALITY settings going) running with DST enabled, when I disabled it....my score dropped DRAMATICALLY to about 2,800. I see why they enabled it...cuz every single nVidia user would feel like they got their asses handed to them if they didn't enable it by default (which is still WRONG).
    Last edited by FrizzleFried; 10-10-2004 at 03:29 PM.

    "AAaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggghhhhhhhhh!!!!"
    - Sen. Howard "Chucky" Dean (New Wack-Job Chairman of the DNC)
    "Those who survived the San Francisco earthquake said, 'Thank God, I'm still alive.' But, of course, those who died, their lives will never be the same again."
    - Sen. Barbara Boxer (Ultra Socialist Twit from CA)

  15. #90
    Joined
    Apr 2004
    Location
    UK
    Age
    36
    Posts
    319

    Re: Post Your 3DMark05 Scores!

    Posted in other, spose this is more official.

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=151545

    6136.
    AMD 64 3700+ (2544mhz )
    DFI Lanparty NF3 250 GB
    Asus X800XT PE
    1 Gig Corsair XMS PC3200
    NEC Mitsubishi 930-SB 19"
    Windows XP Pro SP1
    4.9 Cats

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •