The SuperPI Hall of Fame

[Raybo]

Updated. Interesting that the Linux client is much faster than the Windows one.


M

Hummmmm,

I guess I have to roll up my sleaves and dive into Linux.



Ray

[0156]

[jedihobbit]

Dreamcatcher....using BluHaz reDux's Patriot PDC1G3200+ XBLK.....

[alex666]

Here's my newest, on the same Intel system but using Vista 32-bit:

[UncleBob]

BSEL Mod...now at 1333 FSB, dual Quad Xeons....

[alex666]

Hey Bob, am I reading this correctly? You have dual quads, like 2 x 4 = 8 cores? That's a lot of cores, sort of like cpu polygamy. How do you keep em all happy and busy? We know a lot about that here in Utah . . . .

[UncleBob]

Hey Bob, am I reading this correctly? You have dual quads, like 2 x 4 = 8 cores? That's a lot of cores, sort of like cpu polygamy. How do you keep em all happy and busy? We know a lot about that here in Utah . . . .

They are very happy! Working like big dogs, too. Still quite cool as well.

[baseball_55]

3m14.938

Abit quad gt > 6400 @3.3 (crucial rendition 4,4,4,12)

bb55

[UncleBob]

3:54

Well, I got the Q6600 to 3.02 and it's rock stable. I ran Super Pi with Boinc shut down, btw.



OK, some coaxing got me to 3.15 GHZ at 3:36 !!

[Ned Slider]

Just for grins

Linux 2 mins 38.766 secs

Reminds me of this thread we had going a couple years back:

http://forums.pcper.com/showthread.p...93&postcount=5

[UncleBob]

Re loaded Core Duo on ASUS P5N-E-SLI

3.58.657!!

[elvin]

20s at 1m / 03m 47s 8m. I just right them down not a picture lover poster hahaha.Memory is 5.5.5.15 these is at 5:4

test 2 timing of 4.4.4.12 1:1 20.763s / 52.799s.

all those test are done at 7x multi bottom are at 8x multi default for my cpu just to compare purpose.

1m 19.344s / 8m 37.32s

If you notice or not some folks show on test a drop in time on there test Alex for example shows and error which would give him a faster result,look at his picture shows at 2m one of them result is and error of you think about it he shows at 2m a 0.525 which is not in order with the rest which i would say it's and error that it pickup couldn't finish so it stops and jumps on next which at the end gives him a faster result.Anyone else notice this.

[boratking21]

1M took 26s, 8m took 5min31s.
Dell Latitude D820, T7200 C2D @2.0Ghz, 2gigs of 667Mhz ram. totaly stock.

[Meridian]

Updated. And you new people please give me the decimal places in future? Cheers.


M

[alex666]

If you notice or not some folks show on test a drop in time on there test Alex for example shows and error which would give him a faster result,look at his picture shows at 2m one of them result is and error of you think about it he shows at 2m a 0.525 which is not in order with the rest which i would say it's and error that it pickup couldn't finish so it stops and jumps on next which at the end gives him a faster result.Anyone else notice this.

I just happened to catch this following the post today, as I scrolled back a bit. IElvin said there was an error in my printout, but I think he read the printout incorrectly. This was from my SuperPi run after installing Vista, which is pictued in my previous posting. I think he misread 2m 00.525s line as the "2mg" point in the run, rather than 2 minutes, 0.525 seconds. Something like that. There is no error in that printout that I can see.

marty