Page 79 of 84 FirstFirst ... 2969757677787980818283 ... LastLast
Results 1,171 to 1,185 of 1259
  1. #1171
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    16,840

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]






    TDS & LHS
    Last edited by tucker; 01-07-2018 at 01:52 PM.
    “What Happened”...

  2. #1172
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    16,840

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveW View Post
    ^^^ I believe the correct term for it, in addition to TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) would be LHS (Liberal Hypocrisy Syndrome)...
    There’s alway RLLLS (Radical Left Lying Liberals Syndrome)
    “What Happened”...

  3. #1173
    Joined
    May 2002
    Location
    Twain Harte, CA
    Posts
    18,924

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    Idiots.

    The I's have it.

  4. #1174
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    16,840

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    ^^
    “What Happened”...

  5. #1175
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    16,840

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    Judge rules against Trump administration on rescinding DACA

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...ding-daca.html

    The demorats went Judge shopping again this time at the legal mall of injustice in San Francisco, Again! Interesting blocking disposal of an illegal Obambi presidential order.

    I wonder if TT can give us legal insight as to why this court order is legal.
    Last edited by tucker; 01-10-2018 at 09:26 AM.
    “What Happened”...

  6. #1176
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    16,840

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    Anastasia Tonello

    https://mobile.twitter.com/anastasianylon

    Like me you’ve probably never heard of her before. Let me introduce a lawyer for all the facist communist globalists for all the bleeding hearts. Based in New York and London... Hmmm who would have thunk...
    Last edited by tucker; 01-10-2018 at 10:18 AM.
    “What Happened”...

  7. #1177
    Joined
    May 2004
    Location
    village of idiots
    Posts
    1,799

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    here's the judge's ruling. maybe you can read up on what he bases his decision on. i see fox didn't bother listing it.

    https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000...5-fffa4f5d0001

    i like this part.


    Balance of Equities and Public Interest.
    On provisional relief motions, district judges must consider whether (or not) such relief
    would be in the public interest. On this point, we seem to be in the unusual position wherein the
    ultimate authority over the agency, the Chief Executive, publicly favors the very program the
    agency has ended. In September, President Trump stated his support for DACA, tweeting:
    “Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who
    have jobs, some serving in the military? Really! . . . .” He has also called upon Congress to
    ratify DACA, tweeting, “Congress now has 6 months to legalize DACA (something the Obama
    Administration was unable to do). If they can’t, I will revisit this issue!” (App. 1958).
    For the reasons DACA was instituted, and for the reasons tweeted by President Trump,
    this order finds that the public interest will be served by DACA’s continuation (on the conditions
    and exceptions set out below).
    Beginning March 5, absent an injunction, one thousand
    individuals per day, on average, will lose their DACA protection. The rescission will result in
    hundreds of thousands of individuals losing their
    work authorizations and deferred action status.
    This would tear authorized workers from our
    nation’s economy and would prejudice their being
    able to support themselves and their families, not to mention paying taxes to support our nation.
    Too, authorized workers will lose the benefit
    of their employer-provided healthcare plans and
    thus place a greater burden on emergency healthcare services.
    On provisional relief motions, district judges
    must also weigh the balance of hardships
    flowing from a grant versus denial of provisional
    relief. The hardship to plaintiffs need not be
    repeated. The only hardship raised by defendants is interference with the agency’s judgment on
    how best to allocate its resources in keeping our homeland secure, as well as its judgment in
    phasing out DACA. Significantly, however, the
    agency’s judgment here was not based on a
    policy change. It was based on a mistake of law. If the instant order is correct that DACA fell
    within the statutory and constitutional powers of the Executive Branch, then a policy supported
    as high up as our Chief Executive has been the victim of a colossal blunder. A preliminary
    injunction will set that right without imposing any policy unwanted by the Executive Branch.
    it can always be appealed to a higher court.

    bb

  8. #1178
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    16,840

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    Quote Originally Posted by baghdad bob View Post
    here's the judge's ruling. maybe you can read up on what he bases his decision on. i see fox didn't bother listing it.

    https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000...5-fffa4f5d0001

    i like this part.




    it can always be appealed to a higher court.

    bb
    Yup and it will be...
    “What Happened”...

  9. #1179
    Joined
    Mar 2002
    Location
    California
    Posts
    25,490

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    Quote Originally Posted by baghdad bob View Post
    here's the judge's ruling. maybe you can read up on what he bases his decision on. i see fox didn't bother listing it.

    https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000...5-fffa4f5d0001

    i like this part.




    it can always be appealed to a higher court.

    bb

    So the judge made his decision based on a Tweet... solid. Whats next.. are we going to be able to set the law of the land based on a candidates campaign rhetoric?



    "The most dangerous myth is the demagoguery that business can be made to pay a larger share, thus relieving the individual. Politicians preaching this are either deliberately dishonest, or economically illiterate, and either one should scare us...
    Only people pay taxes, and people pay as consumers every tax that is assessed against a business."


    -The Gipper


  10. #1180
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    16,840

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    ^^ Strange he was talking about democracy...
    “What Happened”...

  11. #1181
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    16,840

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    Greyhound bus chased by police after illegal immigrant threatens passengers

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/01/14...assengers.html

    An all to frequent event. I suggest they send him to San Francisco for trial. They’ll take care of him in the harshest way.
    “What Happened”...

  12. #1182
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    16,840

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    Racism charges swarm Trump as 'shithole' debate rattles immigration talks
    A year into his presidency, disputes over the president’s views and rhetoric about religious and racial minorities continue to hamper his policies.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...hithole-340601

    Well DACA and the so-called dreamers are in control of the federal government for now. Many thanks to the democrats and MSM. All of our enemies are laughing at us and the rest of the world except Europe are shaking their head in disbelief. Thanks Dickless Durbin.
    Last edited by tucker; 01-14-2018 at 08:27 PM.
    “What Happened”...

  13. #1183
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    16,840

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    Judge's DACA ruling seen by some legal scholars as problematic, report says

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...port-says.html

    Fake ruling from the fake 9th Circuit’s Alsup.
    Last edited by tucker; 01-15-2018 at 09:00 AM.
    “What Happened”...

  14. #1184
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    16,840

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    Illegal immigrant charged in the killings of two cops wishes he 'had killed more of the mother-------'

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/01/17...re-mother.html

    Another hard working illegal immigrant hiding in the shadows. All he needs is an anchor baby and a trial in San Francisco. Heavy on the chain migration from shithole countries. DACA!
    “What Happened”...

  15. #1185
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    16,840

    Re: The Senate's "Grand Bargain" [Immigration Debate]

    Report reveals 92 percent of foreign nationals in federal prisons are illegal immigrants

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...mmigrants.html

    Bigoted Racism! Open the gates of hell...
    “What Happened”...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •