Page 69 of 69 FirstFirst ... 19596566676869
Results 1,021 to 1,023 of 1023
  1. #1021
    Joined
    Mar 2002
    Location
    California
    Posts
    26,285

    Re: The $825B & $447B Economic Stimulus Packages

    It's a (D)emorat "recovery"...

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...on_750068.html
    Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession

    Jeffrey H. Anderson

    August 23, 2013 9:03 AM



    President Obama likes to talk about income inequality, but what matters far more is the actual income of the typical American. And how has the typical American household income fared on Obama's watch? Well, the economic "recovery" has now spanned an Olympiad, and during that time the typical American household income has not only dropped—it has dropped more than twice as much as it did during the recession.

    New estimates derived from the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey by Sentier Research indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession. During the recession, the median American household income fell by $1,002 (from $55,480 to $54,478). During the recovery—that is, from the officially defined end of the recession (in June 2009) to the most recent month for which figures are available (June 2013)—the median American household income has fallen by $2,380 (from $54,478 to $52,098). So the typical American household is making almost $2,400 less per year (in constant 2013 dollars) than it was four years ago, when the Obama "recovery" began.

    Importantly, these income tallies include government payouts such as unemployment compensation and cash welfare. So Obama's method of funneling ever-more money and power to Washington, and then selectively divvying some of it back out, clearly isn't working for the typical American family. Nor would his proposed immigration bill help the income prospects of the median American.

    And perhaps it's just a coincidence, but the span of time over which the typical American household's income has dropped by about $2,400 a year (during an ostensible "recovery") corresponds almost exactly with the span of time that we've been living with the looming specter of Obamacare—which began to be debated in earnest around June 2009.





    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...on_750068.html
    LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION HITS 34-YEAR LOW

    A comprehensive disaster like the Obama administration can’t be summed up in one statistic, but the one that comes closest is labor force participation. The combined effect of many misguided policies–Obamacare, ballooning spending, massive debt, tax increases, subsidizing of inefficient energy, anti-growth regulation, encouragement of food stamp fraud, and many more–has been to drive many millions of Americans out of the labor force. Express Employment Professionals has produced a white paper that illuminates this human tragedy:
    The labor force participation rate is currently at a level not seen since the 1970s – 63.4 percent.
    While the unemployment rate has steadily decreased from its high of 10.0 percent in October of 2009 to 7.4 percent in July of 2013, the percentage of Americans in the labor force has not risen. It has fallen about 2.7 percentage points since the onset of the latest recession.
    This is a tragedy in the making, and its impact on the country has been underestimated. When Americans quit looking for work because they conclude not working beats working, America faces a significant problem.
    This chart shows labor force participation from 2007 through 2013. Note that what has mostly driven Americans out of the labor force is not the recession that ended in 2009, but rather the Obama policies that followed:

    President Obama’s policies have devastated all age groups, but the most heartbreaking impact is on the young:
    Gallup reports that, “The lack of new hiring over the past several years…seems to have disproportionately reduced younger Americans’ ability to obtain full-time jobs.”
    According to Gallup’s “Payroll to Population” measure, fewer Millennials were working full time in June of 2013 than in June of 2012, 2011, or 2010.
    A recent 2012 Pew Research Center study found that 36 percent of the nation’s Millennials were still living with their parents.
    Millions of older Americans have responded to the lack of job opportunities under Obamanomics by becoming “disabled.” Based on disability statistics, you would think that Americans have suddenly gotten sickly, or perhaps that we have been fighting a war:
    A study from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco also attributes the drop in [labor force participation] in part to the “increased use of some social benefit programs, notably disability insurance.”
    Fourteen million Americans, including roughly 8.5 million former workers receive disability. In 2011, that included 4.6 percent of the population between the ages of 18 and 64. These Americans are not included among the “unemployed.”
    Fourteen million Americans on disability–that is more than the populations of Wyoming, Vermont, North Dakota, Alaska, South Dakota, Delaware, Rhode Island, Montana, New Hampshire, Maine, Hawaii, Idaho and West Virginia, combined: every man, woman and child in 13 states. The exploding ranks of the “disabled” are due to the absence of jobs in Barack Obama’s economy. The human cost of this tragedy is incalculable.
    The CEO of Express Employment Professionals, a former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, says: “All indicators suggest this shift [out of the labor force] is not sustainable.” That’s putting it mildly. It is inherent in the human condition (the modern version of the human condition, anyway) that those of working age must produce enough to support children and the elderly as well as themselves. But when only 63% of those who are of working age are actually working, they must support not only the young and the old, but more than one-half of another person of working age who isn’t working. That is a recipe for not just economic, but social collapse. It is the most bitter legacy of the Obama years.
    "The most dangerous myth is the demagoguery that business can be made to pay a larger share, thus relieving the individual. Politicians preaching this are either deliberately dishonest, or economically illiterate, and either one should scare us...
    Only people pay taxes, and people pay as consumers every tax that is assessed against a business."


    -The Gipper


  2. #1022
    Joined
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Colorafornia, USSA
    Age
    47
    Posts
    13,825

    Re: The $825B & $447B Economic Stimulus Packages

    Man am I ever glad the idiot was re-elected so he can continue these excellent policies that have made this country so much stronger and brought back respect of the US to the rest of the world! The best is yet to come too I fear.

  3. #1023
    Joined
    May 2002
    Location
    A Little South of Sanity
    Posts
    12,925

    Re: The $825B & $447B Economic Stimulus Packages

    ^ Yeah, Obamacare is still phasing in which will wreak more havoc on our economy, and there's still much work left to do in the Middle East to restore worldwide respect towards the US.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •