SSD Page File Settings in Vista
Which option would result in faster performance on a SSD drive...
1-Set a fixed page file size?
2-Start off the page file very small or zero and let it grow as needed?
Option 1 would suffer a performance hit because the SSD would have to issue the erase command each time it wanted to overwrite data in the file.
Option 2 would suffer because the file would have to be expanded each time the data needed more room.
If the drive (Vertex) was kept clean with the TRIM/garbage collection function then there would be no erasing involved with areas that the file expanded into.
So which function is faster?
Erasing blocks to be overwritten inside a fixed page file or a dynamic page file resizing into clean blocks?
Last edited by andrewsfm; 09-25-2009 at 11:00 AM.
??Hr+ Prime95 x64 Stable
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz (Stepping A/Revision E0/SLB8V) / Stock Voltage / 3.27GHz@385x8.5
Scythe Infinity 5 CPU Cooler
G.Skill RipjawsX 8GB DDR3-1600 (PC3-12800) (F3-12800CL8D-8GBXM) / 4GB x 2 Dual-Channel Mode / 770MHz@8-8-8-24 Timings
Gigabyte GA-EP35C-DS3R Motherboard
Enermax FMA II DXX EG465P-VE 460W Power Supply
Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 5670 Video Card / PCI-E
OCZ Vertex 2 60GB SSD / 64MB
WD Caviar Black 2TB SATA II Hard Drive / 64MB
WD 750GB SATA II Hard Drive
Seagate 500GB SATA II Hard Drive
Samsung SH-S203B SATA DVD Writer
LG GBC-H20L SATA Blu-Ray Reader
Internal USB Flash Memory Card Reader
Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Ultimate