just like she was eh?
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/teacher-re...ory?id=8880598
just like she was eh?
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/teacher-re...ory?id=8880598
.
It 's like that in almost the whole of the Western world; nobody dare say anything against them for fear of being called a racist.
It has nothing to do with race, but with extreme religious preachings and followers !
It 's them who hate us (for lots of things) and that gets developed in to murderous hate ! (see the explosive packed followers who blow themselves up amongst innocent people they don't know)
.
OMFG! Forget apples and oranges, this is more like apples and rocket fuel. Two TOTALLY different things happened here. Let me spell it out for you. One story is a teacher who may have had an affair with a student. Her name was wrongfully dragged through the mud by the media and a lot of other people. A he said she said situation where there were no witnesses and they took the word of a high school boy as gospel.
The other story is a guy who goes through an army base shooting as many people as possible. There are HUNDREDS of witnesses! He was finally put down (not with a bullet between the eyes unfortunately) by force while still holding the murder weapons. In other words known as getting caught red handed.
I will agree with you that the media has to refer to him as the alleged shooter. I won't however agree with you that anyone else has to.

Different incidents but its still the same thing. Unless you are him or one of the people directly involved you have no real say. Im not saying you can't call him guilty. This is still a partially free country you can say whatever you want. I am just saying you really should wait before jumping to conclusions. Sometimes the truth might suprise you. Peoples lives shouldnt be ruined while they are still considered accused.
You are welcome to have an opinion. Just realize it is only an opinion not fact.
Last edited by Bearded Frog; 11-11-2009 at 04:23 PM.
Forty one people were gunned down, twelve people had their lives "ruined" in a very permanent sense. A little bit of opinion could have gone a long way to change that fact, or at least to stop it from becoming a fact.
This politically correct crap has gone a few steps too far.
Its time to change this tune from "the Fort Hood tragedy" to "The Fort Hood Terrorist Attack".
Anyone know when this guy joined the army?
If 8 million people were gunned down it still wouldn't change the fact that what you just said is completely unconnected to what I said. Yes, there is a good chance someone should have noticed the signs on this guy. What does that have to do with innocent until provent guilty?
Its not time to change any tunes. If you call it a terrorist attack right now does that solve anything? We need to just find the facts and assess and deal with them as they come. Until they are all there we should stop jumping to conclusions and guilt.
^^^ Havin' a little trouble connecting the dots?
At least some in DC get it.http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29411.htmlSen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) Wednesday called the Fort Hood killings an “act of terror” and joined a parade of GOP critics in suggesting that “political correctness” might have been a factor in not preventing the shootings.
“We ought to make sure ‘political correctness’ never impedes national security,” McCain said in a speech at the University of Louisville.
McCain’s comments echoed those of a variety of Republican politicians and commentators — as well as Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn) — over the past few days as information about the background of the alleged shooter has surfaced in the media. The criticisms, which initially focused on the failure of the administration and the Army to use the word “terrorism” or “jihadism” in connection with Fort Hood, are now being merged with a larger Republican portrayal of the Obama administration’s approach toward terrorism generally.
And I'm guessing that there's a concerted movement afoot to paint this as if its not a terrorist attack on American soil under Obama's watch.
I don't know... What makes this any different from the drama at Columbine or any other gun toting wanker who goes on a spree? The fact that this one is a Muslim doesn't change one bit imo. That he might be motivated by his extreme interpretation of his religion is just another motivation to me. There's only one important thing all those kinds of murderers have in common. They're looneys and that's that, imho.
If someone here wants to use the word "alleged" that's just another choice, and I don't see why there should be that much fuss around it. Either you use it or you don't. I won't use it because of the obviousness of guilt of this wanker, but that's just me.
Whisper Performance setup:
Asus Maximus Formula (X38)
Asus Geforce EN8800GT
Intel Q6600 3720 Mhz 1.45v.
2x 74Gb WD Raptors RAID-0
WinXP Pro SP2
Eheim 1048 // Apogee GT // Black Ice GT Stealth 240 XFlow
TT Mozart Tx
This forum isn’t a court of law therefore I can express my opinion and state the more than obvious facts. This guy is guilty of an act of terror against the United States of America. He was not only facilitated by out of control political correctness he was virtually given the green light by our intelligence agencies and the US Army. As far as I’m concerned they are guilty of facilitating an act of terror.
Many heads should roll as far as I’m concerned…
Of course this a**hole is crazier than bat shit but aren’t all Jihadists and Islamic Extremists…![]()