Page 1 of 15 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 223
  1. #1
    Joined
    Mar 2002
    Location
    California
    Posts
    26,273

    NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    So where are all you anti-war moonbats hiding out at? I seem to remember quite a few posters here going absolutely apesh*t when GW started lobbin missiles.

    Lemme qualify that by saying it's about time our post turtle-n-chief did the right thing. Shame it took the French and other countries to show the clueless twat sitting in the Oval office what leadership means.

    U.S. Tomahawk Cruise Missiles Hit Targets in Libya
    Pentagon: 112 Missiles Fired at More Than 20 Targets Inside Libya


    Let's hope our community organizer does not go limp d*ck and lose this war also.
    "The most dangerous myth is the demagoguery that business can be made to pay a larger share, thus relieving the individual. Politicians preaching this are either deliberately dishonest, or economically illiterate, and either one should scare us...
    Only people pay taxes, and people pay as consumers every tax that is assessed against a business."


    -The Gipper


  2. #2
    Joined
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Obamaland
    Age
    37
    Posts
    9,532

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    Quote Originally Posted by AMDScooter View Post
    So where are all you anti-war moonbats hiding out at?
    Here.

    Leaders change. Everything else stays the same.

  3. #3
    Joined
    May 2002
    Location
    A Little South of Sanity
    Posts
    12,925

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    Let's not give the boy too much credit here - he didn't lead anything and in fact followed the French into battle.......

    Yes, where are the whiners? Seems war is ok as long as a liberal presides. Gitmo is still open for business, and we're still in Iraq, Afghanistan ain't goin too well - Clinton had the same free pass from both the media and the whiners.
    Last edited by SteveW; 03-20-2011 at 11:16 AM.

  4. #4
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    10,610

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    So where are all you anti-war moonbats hiding out at? I seem to remember quite a few posters here going absolutely apesh*t when GW started lobbin missiles.
    As usual you are making up you're own reality. Perhaps you are referring to people who disagreed to invading Iraq. Quite a different thing. Americans are not anti-war, they are anti-stupid.

    Lemme qualify that by saying it's about time our post turtle-n-chief did the right thing. Shame it took the French and other countries to show the clueless twat sitting in the Oval office what leadership means.
    Still looking for a Fuhrer to replace GW, you know the guy that started well in Afghanistan with the backing of all the American people, then abandoned the effort, leaving a cesspool to develop, to invade Iraq, with no plan of what to do with it when he got it. Just what we need now, a "leader" that leaves a mess in every country he touched, including ours. Leadership is defined by results. We know what your kind of leadership gets us.
    PS, it's Frances oil, they should take the lead. Letting France and Britain get UN sanction in 2 weeks beats the months of lying through our teeth to get the last one.
    Unfortunately it will be our airmen and sailors at the sharp end as usual. Since it's what you are calling for any way I don't want to hear you bitch about spending the money we don't have on it or the lives that are lost.

    By the way, what happened to the be loyal to the Fuhrer no matter how stupid what he wanted do was. By your own standards you are a traitor to the United States of America. Yes you're right, you were a fool then, but that is not a license to be so disrespectful to the current President. Agree with a president or don't, but leave the foul language out of it.


    "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them."
    - Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

  5. #5
    Joined
    May 2002
    Location
    A Little South of Sanity
    Posts
    12,925

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    ^^^^ Nice spindoctoring job - completely avoiding where we've been the last 3 years.

    Still in Iraq, Afghanistan is going nowhere, Gitmo is still open for business, and now Libya.

    Wasn't the grand plan to close Gitmo, exit Iraq and "Prosecute" the war in Afghanistan.

    Haven't seen much of any of that.......have you? Oh, I know it's the timetable he's on right? Just slipped the election urgency and promises until the next admistration - meanwhile, more debt.......

    The current president has more than earned any level of disrespect thrown his way - besides, it's the highest form of patriotism.

  6. #6
    Joined
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Oregon
    Age
    40
    Posts
    6,498

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    Quote Originally Posted by TheGlasMan View Post
    As usual you are making up you're own reality. Perhaps you are referring to people who disagreed to invading Iraq. Quite a different thing. Americans are not anti-war, they are anti-stupid.



    Still looking for a Fuhrer to replace GW, you know the guy that started well in Afghanistan with the backing of all the American people, then abandoned the effort, leaving a cesspool to develop, to invade Iraq, with no plan of what to do with it when he got it. Just what we need now, a "leader" that leaves a mess in every country he touched, including ours. Leadership is defined by results. We know what your kind of leadership gets us.
    PS, it's Frances oil, they should take the lead. Letting France and Britain get UN sanction in 2 weeks beats the months of lying through our teeth to get the last one.
    Unfortunately it will be our airmen and sailors at the sharp end as usual. Since it's what you are calling for any way I don't want to hear you bitch about spending the money we don't have on it or the lives that are lost.

    By the way, what happened to the be loyal to the Fuhrer no matter how stupid what he wanted do was. By your own standards you are a traitor to the United States of America. Yes you're right, you were a fool then, but that is not a license to be so disrespectful to the current President. Agree with a president or don't, but leave the foul language out of it.
    Come on Glas, you know the real reason BHO waited to bomb Libya was because he didn't want to invade his homeland

    Nice retort to a ridiculous OP

  7. #7
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    10,610

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    That's your opinion, but they are all facts. Takes longer and costs more to clean up a mess then to make one.

    Iraq, following the Bush Treaty, Afghanistan is still a mess (see above) but at least it is not being neglected even as it is being ignored by just about everyone (there is no "winning" political position to take)
    With Gitmo, I wish he had followed through with closing it, but with republicans starting fights every thing I can see why it was allowed to fade away. After all Congress recently renewed the totally unconstitutional law that the President can pick an American citizens up with a signature and hold them incommunicado forever. (the Constitution is very specific about how and when this can be done constitutionally, but why bother) The military can hold nonmilitary US citizens for years and treat arrested soldiers like the do the terrorists. Conservatives used to know a Right yielded to the government will never be returned, but I guess they forgot.

    As to the last 3 years, haven't you seen more going on then anytime in your life? We are all living in interesting times. As detailed above our accused socialist-fascist president can get the trains running on time anytime he wants. Wouldn't be very American though.

    edit
    Come on Glas, you know the real reason BHO waited to bomb Libya was because he didn't want to invade his homeland
    Which one?
    Last edited by TheGlasMan; 03-20-2011 at 01:00 PM.


    "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them."
    - Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

  8. #8
    Joined
    May 2002
    Location
    A Little South of Sanity
    Posts
    12,925

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    Cleanup most certainly does take longer. National Health care and our deficit will take the next 100 years.
    Last edited by SteveW; 03-20-2011 at 02:18 PM.

  9. #9
    Joined
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Oregon
    Age
    40
    Posts
    6,498

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    Quote Originally Posted by TheGlasMan View Post
    That's your opinion, but they are all facts. Takes longer and costs more to clean up a mess then to make one.

    Iraq, following the Bush Treaty, Afghanistan is still a mess (see above) but at least it is not being neglected even as it is being ignored by just about everyone (there is no "winning" political position to take)
    With Gitmo, I wish he had followed through with closing it, but with republicans starting fights every thing I can see why it was allowed to fade away. After all Congress recently renewed the totally unconstitutional law that the President can pick an American citizens up with a signature and hold them incommunicado forever. (the Constitution is very specific about how and when this can be done constitutionally, but why bother) The military can hold nonmilitary US citizens for years and treat arrested soldiers like the do the terrorists. Conservatives used to know a Right yielded to the government will never be returned, but I guess they forgot.


    As to the last 3 years, haven't you seen more going on then anytime in your life? We are all living in interesting times. As detailed above our accused socialist-fascist president can get the trains running on time anytime he wants. Wouldn't be very American though.

    edit Which one?
    It was meant as sarcasm...Libya...Kenya...both part of Africa. Little bit of a stretch, I know. My sarcasm has not worked so well of late.

  10. #10
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    21,565

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541–1548) was a United States Congress joint resolution providing that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if the United States is already under attack or serious threat. The War Powers Resolution requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto.
    What’s up with that ^^^

    If Bushy or any other republican president did what Obambi is doing in Libya right now you guys would be going ballistic. That good old double standard enjoyed by the democrats at work again…

    The armed forces of the USA are now engaged in yet another war while the president is off on a jet-set vacation in Rio with the whole family including mom-in-law Mrs Scowler. What’s up with that stuff…

  11. #11
    Joined
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Obamaland
    Age
    37
    Posts
    9,532

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    At least this war isn't based on a lie.

  12. #12
    Joined
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Crazy AZ USA
    Posts
    3,516

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    Actually, I think BO maybe doing the right thing- I'm just not sure about all the motives.

    In all honesty, however, we have very few concerns in Libya and I find that this may well be another "crisis" to exploit. In fact, it's more of a European issue- and if they really want this, they can pick their own fights.

    I wonder how hot this would have been if there were not budget and debt ceiling battles to win?
    "We say in our platform that we believe that the right to coin money and issue money is a function of government....

    Those who are opposed to this proposition tell us that the issue of paper money is a function of the bank and that the government ought to go out of the banking business. I stand with Jefferson rather than with them, and tell them, as he did, that the issue of money is a function of the government and that the banks should go out of the governing business."

    William Jennings Bryan.

  13. #13
    Joined
    Nov 2001
    Location
    E n g l a n d
    Posts
    10,978

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    Don't worry, the cheese-eating surrender monkeys are leading the attack! Freedom fries all round.

  14. #14
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    21,565

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    Quote Originally Posted by JustinC939 View Post
    At least this war isn't based on a lie.

    What about the legality?

    Silly me I forgot this president is above the law and the constitution.

  15. #15
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kern River Valley, CA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    21,565

    Re: NO BLOOD FOR OIL! Barack Obama bombs Libya

    Quote Originally Posted by Enmore View Post
    Don't worry, the cheese-eating surrender monkeys are leading the attack! Freedom fries all round.

    Is the French Mirage equipped with a popup white flag that can withstand mach speeds…

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •