Thanks for reading my first post btw.
I'm currently on an AM3+ board, I cannot afford to move to another part in the near future. I might jump back to Intel at Cannonlake / Skymount or whatever they intend to call it; but for now I will stay on the one I have got.
My current CPU is the fx6300. Using overdrive I have got it to 4.5 but I didn't leave it there for very long. On the other hand I have come to accept that I have a better chance of having an intellectual conversation with big foot in the middle of time square before AMD will make a steamroller for AM3+.
So my request is this: Which option makes more sense to you?
Fx6300 overclocked to 4.0, and turbo'd (?) to 4.3 or
FX8320 stock clock-speed but turbo OC'd to 4.3?
The first is cheaper for sure (since I already got it), but I'm afraid that if I wait too long to get the 8320 I might not be able to find one..
p.s. I know 6300 OC'd would be faster now, but do you guys think that 8 cores will matter in two years? It would need to last till 2016ish after all, but core count hasn't moved as fast as AMD wanted.
Thanks again those who reply.