wondering how this combo might fair...
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Combo...=Combo.3262621
wondering how this combo might fair...
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Combo...=Combo.3262621
At this point I think your best bet to build a dedicated rig would be to get the cheapest CPU/Mobo combo you can and slap the biggest GPU you can find in it. That machine wouldn't do much on its own, but put a nice GPU in there and you can do some work... I'd just be a little iffy on the PSU
GPU's are really really big and really wide. If you've got the right workload for it (i.e. massively parallel), a GPU can absolutely destroy a CPU for sheer throughput and do so very efficiently. F@H is such a workload and the GPU client has been much more productive than the CPU client for many years now. The last time CPU folding was king was ~2010-2012-ish during the heyday of the -bigadv WU's.
FWIW a GTX 1080 will put out something like 600-800k PPD @ ~180W TDP
Not entirely up to date but should give you an idea
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...ub?output=html
You're a good man, and thorough.
bonus points if you get that movie reference.
Honestly, thank you. I do appreciate the reference.
According to the date presented, I need 30-40 Titan X to hit my goal.
It seems like the architecture of the GPU plays the most important role with the second being clock speed.
i will keep that in mind.
Last edited by Affende; 02-22-2017 at 11:21 PM.
ah he must have posted while I was searching. Thats a good list of modern GPU's.
I would be careful about saying that architecture and speed are the "most important" as it really is a combination of factors, with die size/shader count being another important one. More shaders = more "cores" and at some level more slower cores will still be faster than fewer faster ones. It probably tracks best with FP32 throughput since thats a direct measurement of the chip's compute ability.