Processors Motherboards Chipsets Memory Graphics Cards Storage Cases and Cooling Mobile Systems Displays Shows and Expos
Latest Sponsors

Powered By
Newegg
Tyan Motherboards
Corsair Memory
Western Digital Hard Drives
Red Hat Linux

PC Perspective Forums Sponsor

Go Back   PC Perspective Forums > Hardware (Non-Motherboard) > Processor Discussion
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Rules Members List iTrader Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Processor Discussion All discussion on CPUs go here.

Reply
 §   #1  
Old 02-19-2004, 03:11 PM
Caprid's Avatar
Caprid
Killer Frog
Powderhound
 
Profile
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: The Goat Pen
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 4,087
Post How do you Overclock a A64?

Seems like all the good threads always wind up getting side tracked into overclocking threads. So I figured I make one just for that purpose.

If your choice of a board will be made mainly for overclocking in mind. You should pick one that has those options available, to make it easier. You'll want to find one that has some sort of an AGP/PCI lock or working divider. Since the motherboad manufactures won't come flat out and tell you wants going on you'll have find out yourselves. Good thread on that Here (once you skip over the Oclocking posts) Irregardless of how it works, the fact is that some boards will do well over 300FSB and some won't.

Secondly you'd want to chose a board that will allow you to change the multipliers. The A64s will not go over their default multi, but will go lower if the boards BIOS has that option available.(Cool&Quite) This will help you max out your CPU.

It would help if you had a basic understanding of how to overclock(google is your friend) This is mainly for the A64s because they are so different from the XPs. The main difference is that the memory controller is intergraded inside the CPU and not by the North Bridge. Also the AGP tunnel or HTT link doesn't go through the North bride either, this cuts down on latency for both, and is were the performance gains come from over the XPs clock for clock. There is no "FSB" for the A64s, it's just a clock generator for the CPU. I try to think of it as a more complex multiplier adjustment, as it's disconnected from the bus entirely. One other big difference is, that the A64s do not seem to take any performance hit running aysnc like the XPs do. Your RAM running at 230Mhz it's running at 230Mhz irregardless of if it's 1:1 6:5 or any other memory divider, that goes back to the "FSB" setting being more of a complex multiplier. And lastly, is the HTT speed. You'll have to lower it to get the most out of your system. Once again, there seems to be no performance hit by slowing it down. I've done alot of testing and found that only "synthetic" benchmarks benefit from the higher HTT speed, I think in part because they only test the theoretical performance and not actual performance. In real life apps and games, can't take advantage of the full bandwidth of AGP tunnel, so lowering it has little or no effect. Unless you want to see a big 3Dmark score. Other than the games, I also ran SPECView 7.1.1 to see if it effects Open GL graphics rendering.

Now for the fun part
Once you select the right board, going about overclocking it is pretty much the same as for the XP's except for a few extra steps. In no particular order, you find your Max CPU speed, Max memory speed, and Max HTT speed. The trick is to try to clock your memory as high as it will go, you'll most likely need multipliers for that unless you have some poor RAM, and you will need the memory divider because of the locked higher multipliers. I would suggest using ClockGen for this, it'll save alot of reboots. We'll start with the HTT first because that's the easiest, and it will hinder your later efforts.

Max HTT
Lower your multiplier to say 6X or so, use the 3:2 RAM divider,raise your LTD voltage(if you can) use the highest HTT setting, and leave your "FSB" at 200. Start going up from there. The VIA boards should start running into trouble at 220 or so, the NF3 at 230 or there abouts. The reason is at MAX HTT, the NF3 is at HTTX3 and the faster VIA is HTTX4. Once you find the Max HTT, find the highest for the other LDT setting, x2,x1...
Max CPU
Set your HTT to the lowest setting, set your 3:2 RAM divider, Leave your 'FSB' at 200 and your multiplier to default(highest) Then have at it. You can raise your Vcore before this step to see how high the CPU will go. Yes I know you can leave it at default, but this is an overclocking thread
Max Memory
Set your HTT to the lowest setting,set your 1:1 RAM divider,lower your multiplier to 6X or so, leave your "FSB" at 200, (Optional)raise your Vdimm, get busy.

Once you know were the top speed of everything is, you simply mix and match to try to get the closest to all of them. The most important, performance wise, in order are, the RAM speed, CPU speed, and then the HTT speed. Remember the fun in overclocking comes from the journey, not the final destination

Since it seems to be quite important to the end results. It would be helpful to know what motherboards decided to implement multiplier adjustments in their BIOS. And also which ones have some form of 'Lock' or functioning 'Divider' for the AGP/PCI. If you guys could check to see if your multipliers work and which board your using, we can keep a list of the "haves" and "have nots". A screenie with a multiplier of 6X would be nice, would also be helpful if it had a 'FSB' setting over 300, that would go a long way toward the PCI Lock/Divider question. Sorta like this,




------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A64 Motherboards List




I've taken the liberty to add a AGP/PCI lock column. To qualify, the board must do over 300-HTT, and be confirmed by clockgen. It doesn't prove a lock, but is a nice feature to have.

Check these threads for some more tips and hint's for different boards.
http://forums.amdmb.com/showthread.p...hreadid=302140
http://forums.amdmb.com/showthread.p...hreadid=300022
http://forums.amdmb.com/showthread.p...hreadid=298192
http://forums.amdmb.com/showthread.p...hreadid=298192

If you don't see your motherboard listed let me know. If you see your board with a bunch of ?????? test it Screenies over 300 always welcome, for the PCI question.
__________________


Last edited by Caprid : 03-17-2004 at 08:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
 §   #2  
Old 02-19-2004, 03:12 PM
Caprid's Avatar
Caprid
Killer Frog
Powderhound
 
Profile
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: The Goat Pen
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 4,087
Here are my results from testing the the various speeds of the HTT link. The constants are the CPU speed and Memory speed and timings. The RAM speed was attained by using the RAM dividers and "FSB" adjustments.

Dividers
1:1=200
6:5=166
4:3=150
3:2=133
2:1=100






No difference using Superpi or PiFast. Not surprising since neither one uses the HTTs AGP Tunnel. Next up some Sandra memory, and 3Dmark2001.







Nice little boost in 3Dmark by raising the HTT to it's highest level. But is it consistent? To find out I tested some real games. UT2003, Comanche 4, Jedi Outcast, Return to Castle Wolfenstein, were used.












Hmmm...no change in lowering the HTT Link. After a little though, I decided to test SPECView 7.1.1. It's an Open GL Rending test. I figured that might fill up the HTT.





Pretty much dead flatlined again. Interestingly, the drv-09 and proe-02 test scaled much like 3D2001. All the tests show most times less than 1% But the 345X7 running async with the HTT set at 1X is usually faster than 220X11 running sync with the HTT set at 3X.

It looks so far that the HTT has little to no effect on realworld apps because they can't saturate the HTTs Graphic Tunnel. All the "synthetic" tests that show theoretical performance but don't measure anything, like the extra HTT speed. I didn't test some of the other ones PCmark, Sandra.....I'm assuming they would behave like the other "synthetics" One usefull thing about the "synthetics",is that it shows that PCI Express will not be bottleneck by the AGP Tunnel. Makes you wonder how the Via boards stack up against the NF3 in real life, since they only show 3Dmark scores.


All Graphics gratiously donated by Senor Panadero

Last edited by Caprid : 02-20-2004 at 01:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
 §   #3  
Old 02-19-2004, 04:04 PM
Namek
Retired Moderator
 
Profile
Joined: Feb 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 23
My System
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 10,209
Cap - ever considered using Excel for those charts

Alex
Reply With Quote
 §   #4  
Old 02-19-2004, 05:27 PM
bypolar's Avatar
bypolar
Registered User
 
Profile
Joined: Jun 2003
Location:
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 1,400
I can confirm that the Gigabyte K8NNXP (754) acts the same as your 940 pin version.

My Max HTT bus seems to be 660. My CPU seems to top out @2.3G no matter what settings I use.
I can use Clockgen to change the Multi,FSB(HTT),Agp/Pci fequency. there seems to be a divder concerning the PCI clock, but I have yet to figure out what it is linked to.

I have found that running the memory in sync with the HTT gives me the best benchmark results.
__________________
Biostar T-force NF560+
AMD6400x2
4GB Geil dragon 6400
1-XFX-8800GTX
2-36GB Raptor raid 0 Vista 64
Plextor 760A IDE
Kingwin Mach1 800W
Coolit freezeZone

http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=20035
Reply With Quote
 §   #5  
Old 02-19-2004, 05:45 PM
Caprid's Avatar
Caprid
Killer Frog
Powderhound
 
Profile
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: The Goat Pen
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 4,087
bypolar: I knew that one works also, thanks for the confirmation. Did you try getting the CPU over 2.3Ghz using the method I explained above? Make sure you lower the HTT to X2, or 2.5X That might be why your having problems over 230. If you wanted the multipiers in your BIOS all you have to do is flash the 8KNNXP-940 on your board. It'll work, but I'm not telling you to kill your BIOS chip.

Last edited by Caprid : 02-20-2004 at 06:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
 §   #6  
Old 02-19-2004, 07:36 PM
bypolar's Avatar
bypolar
Registered User
 
Profile
Joined: Jun 2003
Location:
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 1,400
I have lowered the HT to 2.5X and the memory to 5/6 and was able to get my HTT to 250+ 2.3G but anthing over the 2.3G crashed.
So seems that 2.3 is the limit at the moment unless I am missing something.
Reply With Quote
 §   #7  
Old 02-19-2004, 09:57 PM
elusive-dragon
waiting for ET to call
 
Profile
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: JAX, FL
Age: 37
My System
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 2,194
you CAN hit the limit for that chip as well right? not every chip can even be absolute 100% identical...luck of the draw so to speak

(im thinking out loud)

oh yeah great idea for the thread and thanks for the info Caprid
__________________
heat: the-elusive-dragon

Dell XPS desktop
19" monitor
Intel core duo @ 2.2ghz
2gb ram
250gb hdd
nvidia 8600 gts video with 256 ram
saitek backlit kb
razer diamondback mouse (red led)
windows vista
Reply With Quote
 §   #8  
Old 02-20-2004, 09:57 AM
Caprid's Avatar
Caprid
Killer Frog
Powderhound
 
Profile
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: The Goat Pen
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 4,087
Quote:
Originally posted by elusive-dragon on 02-19-2004 at 09:57 PM
you CAN hit the limit for that chip as well right? not every chip can even be absolute 100% identical...luck of the draw so to speak
Sure you can, and will, just like always, you can never get enough cooling and voltages.

BTW Ed, can you change the multipliers on your mobo?
Reply With Quote
 §   #9  
Old 02-20-2004, 10:01 AM
DannyTeets
Registered User
 
Profile
Joined: May 2002
Location: Cumberland, MD
Age: 39
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 265
Ya beat me to it!
__________________
Intel Pentium D 805 Smithfield Dual Core,EM64T Processor

OCZ Gold 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400)

XFX PV-T71G-UCE7 Geforce 7900GT

Antec SUPER LANBOY

Asus P5N32-SLI Deluxe nForce4 SLI
Ultra ULT31852 X2 X-Connect 550W Power Supply (Titanium w/UV Blue) Retail

Plextor PX-750A-BP/BL 16X Internal Dual Layer DVD±R/RW

2X Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD2500KS 250GB

Zalman CNPS9500 LED CPU Cooler Retail
Reply With Quote
 §   #10  
Old 02-20-2004, 10:04 AM
Caprid's Avatar
Caprid
Killer Frog
Powderhound
 
Profile
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: The Goat Pen
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 4,087
Any luck with the multipliers on your Chaintech board? I'll add it to the list.
Reply With Quote
 §   #11  
Old 02-20-2004, 10:13 AM
DannyTeets
Registered User
 
Profile
Joined: May 2002
Location: Cumberland, MD
Age: 39
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 265
Won't know til tomorrow. I'm at work and we work 24 hour shifts here.
Reply With Quote
 §   #12  
Old 02-20-2004, 10:19 AM
kkktoh
Registered User
 
Profile
Joined: Jan 2004
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally posted by DannyTeets on 02-20-2004 at 03:13 PM
Won't know til tomorrow. I'm at work and we work 24 hour shifts here.
Hope the multipler can work after u have installed the cool n quiet drivers.

All the best...
Reply With Quote
 §   #13  
Old 02-20-2004, 10:34 AM
Caprid's Avatar
Caprid
Killer Frog
Powderhound
 
Profile
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: The Goat Pen
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 4,087
What about yours? Multis work?
Reply With Quote
 §   #14  
Old 02-20-2004, 10:44 AM
kkktoh
Registered User
 
Profile
Joined: Jan 2004
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally posted by Caprid on 02-20-2004 at 03:34 PM
What about yours? Multis work?
Me??

After i have installed the cool n quiet drivers, i could then adjust the multipler in ClockGen.. But even so, i cant adjust the HTT, AGP/PCI frequencies.

I will try again using the clockgen.
Reply With Quote
 §   #15  
Old 02-20-2004, 11:15 AM
Caprid's Avatar
Caprid
Killer Frog
Powderhound
 
Profile
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: The Goat Pen
Status: ( Offline )
Posts: 4,087
Yeah you LOL Trying to get any info out of you guys is like pulling teeth. What motherboard?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Go Back   PC Perspective Forums > Hardware (Non-Motherboard) > Processor Discussion

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© PC Perspective 2000 - Present